Behavior OnLine EMDR FORUM ARCHIVE, 2000

    Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions
    Cahill · 11/01/02 at 6:15 PM ET

    Hi Louise:

    Thanks! The answers were very helpful. I hope you'll indulge me with just a few more.

    1. Is there any theoretical or empirical reason to think that rating the validity of the negative cognition would reduce the efficacy of the treatment?

    2. Is there any theoretical or empirical reason to think that taking frequent SUD ratings would reduce the efficacy of the treatment?

    Thanks.


    Replies:
    • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 11/01/02
      • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Louise Maxfield, 11/02/02
        • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 11/02/02
        • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/02/02
          • associations?, by , 11/02/02
            • Re:associations?, by Cahill, 11/02/02
              • Re:associations?, by , 11/02/02
                • Re:associations?, by Cahill, 11/02/02
                  • Re:associations?, by , 11/03/02
                  • Re:associations?, by Cahill, 11/03/02
                  • Re:associations?, by , 11/03/02
          • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Louise Maxfield, 11/03/02
        • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/02/02
          • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Louise Maxfield, 11/03/02
            • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/03/02
              • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Louise Maxfield, 11/03/02
                • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/03/02
                  • labelling and polarization, by Louise Maxfield, 11/04/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Louise Maxfield, 11/04/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/04/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/04/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by therese.mcgoldrick@fvpc.scot.nhs.uk, 11/13/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/13/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe PhD, 11/13/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/13/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by JT Stratten, 11/14/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 11/14/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by JT Stratten, 11/14/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/20/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/20/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Ricky Greenwald, 11/23/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Ricky Greenwald, 11/23/02
                  • Re:Maxfield & Hyer meta-analysis: A few questions, by Cahill, 11/24/02

    Reply Index Next Previous Help



    | Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

    Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.