Behavior OnLine EMDR FORUM ARCHIVE, 2000

    Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality
    Anonymous · 12/26/02 at 12:09 ET

    "But, based on my understanding of the biology of emotion and the most current neuroscience research, I think that such an intervention more likely enhances “focus” (dopamine enhancement and prefrontal cortical stimulation?) enabling a better understanding of, and a downward/cognitive management of, emotion (emotion is always triggered in, and emanates from, the dominant, faster, and more primitive subcortical neurosystems)."

    I think you make a good point.

    As for the research, I believe only one study showed that bls was not necessary, other studies seemed to show that it WAS a component of treatment. I think the jury's still out... my own therapist sees no problem doing emdr without bls, but that is probably an idiosyncratic stance.

    Replies:
    • please clear up my confusion, by Diane, 12/26/02
      • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Anonymous, 12/26/02
        • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Diane, 12/26/02
          • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Anonymous, 12/27/02
            • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Diane, 12/27/02
              • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Anonymous, 12/27/02
                • Re:please clear up my confusion, by Diane, 12/27/02
    • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by McFall, 12/26/02
      • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Ricky Greenwald, 12/28/02
        • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Cahill, 12/28/02
          • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Anonymous, 12/29/02
            • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Ricky Greenwald, 12/29/02
              • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Cahill, 12/31/02
                • Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by McFall, 01/11/03
                  • Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/16/03
                  • Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Cahill, 01/16/03
                  • Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/17/03
                  • Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Barbara, 01/17/03
                  • Sandra, by Cahill, 01/18/03
                  • Re:Sandra, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/18/03
                • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Ricky Greenwald, 01/18/03
                  • Request for Ricky, by Cahill, 01/19/03
                  • Re:Request for Ricky, by Ricky Greenwald, 01/20/03
                  • Re:Request for Ricky, by Cahill, 01/20/03
                  • Re:Request for Ricky, by Cahill, 01/20/03
                  • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Barbara, 01/20/03
      • Re:Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Forgot To Include Name, 01/20/03
        • Forgotten Name, by Cahill, 01/20/03
          • Empirically Supported Treatments, by Anonymous, 01/20/03
            • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Ricky Greenwald, 01/20/03
              • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Barbara, 01/21/03
                • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Barbara, 01/21/03
                  • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Cahill, 01/21/03
                  • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/21/03
                  • Disseminating EMDR, by Cahill, 01/26/03
                  • Re:Empirically Supported Treatments, by Barbara, 01/23/03
                  • Always drink coffee, by Cahill, 01/23/03
            • To Anonymous regarding ESTs, by Cahill, 01/21/03
              • Re:To Anonymous regarding ESTs, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/21/03

    Reply Index Next Previous Help



    | Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

    Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.