Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality

Shawn: Excellent, and apparently unassailable, assessment. To summarize: There’s no evidence that eye movement, or any alternating movement, is a necessary component of “EMDR”--all the evidence indicates there’s nothing unique about EMDR, and that it’s a rip-off form, with a few extra meaningless bells and whistles, of cognitive and/or cognitive-behavioral therapy. McFall

Replies:

Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/16/03 Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Cahill, 01/16/03 Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/17/03 Re: Scientific Jargon vs. reality, by Barbara, 01/17/03 Sandra, by Cahill, 01/18/03 Re:Sandra, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 01/18/03

| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.