I'm sorry to burst your bubble but I was under the impression that this was a discussion group for professionals (with lay people always being welcomed of course). There are 2 years of one sided messages for you to read through prior to my postings. This should provide you with more than enough info on what you are seeking. However, I thought this was a "discussion" group but you can't have a discussion with only one side being heard. Do the professionals on this list feel that controversial issues in EMDR should be pushed under the carpet and not discussed? This is a discussion group so let's present the issues--both sides! Unless the professionals on this list are afraid of the evidence that is. I still look forward to at least one professional contradicting the comments I made in my original posting regarding EMDR and the evidence. We just keep getting off topic. If not I must assume that the evidence does not support EMDR being any more than CBT with superfluous things added to appear new. If so, this is a real issue to discuss. Thanks as always, Brian
Replies:
|
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.