Only a layperson here--now wondering, does clinical experience, actually any personal, repetitive, conclusive, observable experience not count if "research" hasn't been accomplished to support it, notwithstanding refute it? I always thought the number one, major concern of psychologist, physicians, etc., was “first, do not harm”. Isn’t it more appropriate to be “safe than sorry?” Just a layperson’s thoughts.
Replies:
|
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.