Behavior OnLine EMDR FORUM ARCHIVE, 2000

    Re:Science and Pseudoscience
    McFall · 12/23/02 at 4:36 PM ET

    Barbara, Good points. From the article noted in an above post, “Empirically Supported Treatments: Cautionary Notes” by Stanley B. Messer, PhD, he writes: “Common factors and therapist variability far outweigh specific ingredients [i.e., the specific techniques or ingredients characteristic of a treatment] in accounting for the benefits of psychotherapy. The proportion of variance contributed by common factors such as placebo effects, working alliance, therapist allegiance and competence are much greater than the variance stemming from specific ingredients or effects.”

    Anyway, these “common factors” seem to ring a bell...almost sound like “faith, love, and hope.”

    Replies:
    • Re:Science and Pseudoscience , by Barbara, 12/24/02
      • Re:Science and Pseudoscience , by BP, 12/24/02
        • Re:Science and Pseudoscience , by lc, 12/24/02
          • Merry Christmas to all! , by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 12/25/02
            • Re:Merry Christmas to all! , by Barbara, 12/25/02
            • Re:Merry Christmas to all! , by Bob Cochrane, M.Sc., RCC, 01/31/03

    Reply Index Next Previous Help



    | Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

    Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.