Re: new article on EMDR

from Stacy,
Interesting argument Don:
If someone brings out a new treatment and is informed regarding the research issues, don't trust it. Just use name calling and innuendo to combat it. Assume that the reasons are proprietory. Interesting projection. Perhaps that't the way you live your life. It doesn't mean everyone else does the same.
Perhaps you should look at the long series of postings above and check the reported inaccuracies in the research reports. Perhaps the ones you view as trying to protect science are really protecting their own truf. Or are academic politics, grants, book contracts and speaking engagements immune from that possibility?
By all means stay on the list. I'm curious to see if you bother to check for the inaccuracies. And I would certainly like you to post the link for the article and we can see if, as Dr. Knipe has stated, it is simply a rehash of old arguments by the same people.

Stacy,
Did you read my post? Did I use name calling and innuendo? I dont know what you mean by projection. I dont assume that the reasons are proprietary. I also dont know what you mean about me living my life a certain way. The only "reported inaccuracies in the research reports" in the "above posts" appear to come from the posters. It is a possibility that some individuals are trying to protect their own turf and are threatened by EMDR. I have personally seen no evidence of this in this case but I do not deny that this is possible. Again, when you say bother to check for the inaccuracies, what inaccuracies do you mean? I thought I was bothering to check for the inaccuracies that appear to be ubiquitous on this BB. In fact I thought that that is about what I have been posting.

Sincerely,

Don

Replies:

There are no replies to this message.

| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.