An increasing number of publishers are bringing forth "empirically-based" or "empirically-supported" treatment manuals which purport to provide treatment protocols which make it easy to master state-of-the-art treatment approaches, save time, and improve outcomes. For example, a PsychCorp brochure says "TherapyWorks programs have been proven effective for improving clinical outcomes of specific disorders." Now don't get me wrong, the TherapyWorks publications which I have seen have been well done and are based on solid empirical research. However, when the brochure says "After completing the Panic Control Treatment (PCT) program, 87% of patients remained panic-free at post-treatment" it occurs to me that, in the outcome studies of PCT which I have seen, the therapists didn't simply buy a manual and a workbook then start treating patients, they were trained and supervised by experts. I wonder if PCT (or any of the other empirically-based protocols) will prove as effective when delivered by someone who has simply purchased a treatment manual and is trying to provide treatment "by the book." Is there a risk of undercutting the effectiveness of empirically-supported treatments by giving the impression that they are so simple that one can deliver them effectively without any need for training or supervision?
Replies:
|
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.