Don, I reviewed your posts to the forum and in the earliest one I found, you referred to pro-EMDR posts as "attacks under the guise of scientific enlightenment (and motivated by financial interest & face saving)". You later referred to "pseudo-professionals who say they have seen EMDR work" and those who engage in a "gross distortion of a body of literature". Do you not recognize these statements as ad hominem? Because that's what it's called when you get away from discussing the research itself and started discussing the motivations and qualifications of the people who disagree with you. It's as if you are saying that it is impossible for another professional to take a scientific approach to this body of literature and draw conlcusions different from your own.
Replies:
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.