re: a bad term indeed

I agree, Jas, it is a bad term in that it does imply that lurkers have some unfriendly intention. They may be a bit "antisocial" by not participating, but rarely are they malicious. I wonder where the term originated (probably in Usenet Newsgroups), and what it reflects about net culture. Perhaps because the internet offers the opportunity to INTERACT (and not just observe, as in TV and radio) that when someone chooses NOT to interact, their asocial tendency is perceived as unfriendly. "Lurker" certainly has a paranoid connotation, and that may say something about internet psychology.

Replies:

re: a bad term indeed--maybe not, by Wanda Hill, 3/19/98 re: maybe not, by John Suler, 3/19/98 You are what you're called., by jas cooper, 3/23/98 the opposite of 'lurker' is ..., by John Suler, 3/23/98 re: You are what you're called., by Wanda Hill, 3/23/98

| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

Copyright ©1996-1999 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.