I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're asking. I will, nevertheless, respond.
"Situational ethics" was an expression of a genuine paradigmatic shift. I know this is so, because why else would we know such a rise of protest? Ethics will never be the content of a text: they will always be the result of an awareness of what is responsive in a given situation. I'm not in conflict with anyone. The conflict hasn't arrive yet (but it's on it's way).
I'll take this opportunity to note that these on-line discussioms get confused and testy. My interest is communication.