As I have thought about this further (coinciding with reading Laura Perls's book "Living at the Boundary" published by the Gestalt Journal), I have been thinking about the historical issue of introjecting Fritz Perls. Many authors raise this issue, that Perls's "style" is often mistaken for the content of Gestalt therapy (I think this is Henle's error, as well). Perhaps a contribution of Henle to the field of Gestalt therapy would be to challenge those introjects. I look forward to reading Barlow's article!