A flame by any other name...

• Hi there lurkers! by John Suler, 7/26/97
  • (...)
    
    • leaping from the frying pan into the flame by SusanLCSW@aol.com, 11/11/97
      
      

>What do the rest of you think about posts to bb's that both present a valid argument, and "flame" at the same time? It's easy to "remove" messages that are just insults...but what about when the poster supports his "flame" with rational and important ideas? <

Personally, I'm disappointed that flaming exists to the degree it does. If you don't remove a message that contains flaming, haven't you condoned flaming? While a "flame" might be "supported" with rational and "important" ideas, that doesn't, in my mind, justify flaming as a useful, benefiicial, or acceptable way of communicating those ideas. I've seen some wonderful "flames" which contain few, if any, personally-directed remarks, but it requires a bit of creativity to accomplish it--and creativity can be too time-consuming and bothersome. Might flaming contribute to a "dumbing down" of the vocabulary and interpersonal skills of those who use it?

An aside: How might Winston Churchill or Samuel Clemens fare on usenet?

Another aside: Have you wondered about possible "real world" impact of this medium? As increasing numbers of people participate on the net, will its sometimes abusive manner affect r.w. intercaction? I find it amusing to imagine how a family conflict might be conducted 100 years from now.

It appears mortality does have favorable aspects.

• the art of flaming (?) by John Suler, 11/17/97
• Same ol' song by Loren Bawn, 11/19/97