Re:Your other questions

Thank you for taking so much time with my questions. I'm glad they make sense.

I've read (what I am able to access) of the protocols of Kitchur, Omaha, and Schmidt. All seem to contain some overlap as to grounding of treatment in failed childhood attachments and Ericksonian stages of development.

Do you see your protocol as able to be integrated with any of these? I am wondering, since the idea of working chronologically through trauma/development seems intuitively sensical.

Of course, there's that problem with the word "intuitive" again... :)

Replies:

Re:Your other questions, by Sandra Paulsen Inobe, PhD, 07/14/02 Re:Your other questions, by another client, 07/14/02

| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.