Criticisms of CBT from the British Medical Journal

A series of brief articles debating whether CBT is superior to other treatment approaches or not is available at http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7332/288. Please note that some of the critics give a biased view of the literature. For example, Bolsover cites a handful of studies with methodological flaws and then concludes that the empirical support for CBT is weaker than has been claimed. He conveniently overlooks the large body of well-controlled studies which provide support for CBT.

Replies:

Tom Sensky & Jan Scott's Response to Criticisms of CBT from the British Medical Journal, by Jim Pretzer, 02/10/02

| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.